Quote:
Originally posted by Team Sergeant
Agreed, but we would out the current President based on his failure to protect us....
|
Only if his replacement was deemed to be better at protecting us.
As that does not appear to be the popular opinion, I would say that it would have the opposite effect here.
Additional terrorist attacks here, unless demonstrably caused by Administration neglect, should prove to help the current Administration in their re-election campaign.
Now, if they would only select a VP who brings something more electable to the table. Like Powell, or Rice.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|