Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

QRQ 30 · 09-14-2005, 08:05

I was watching the POTUS address the UN this morning and he mentioned "Weapons of Mass Murder".

I am so glad he got away from the term "Mass Destruction". I never thought that the term was appropriate. The more insidious weapons are chemical and biological which kill without destroying structures or equipment. I always thought that "WMD" were better defined as "Weapons of Mass Death".

I hope it sticks.

Another interesting thing he mentioned was that more than 150 nations have sent aid to the Katrina AO. That's considerably more than the conservative media reported.

09-14-2005, 08:05	#1
QRQ 30 Quiet Professional Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Williamston, SC Posts: 2,018	A Better Definition of WMD I was watching the POTUS address the UN this morning and he mentioned "Weapons of Mass Murder". I am so glad he got away from the term "Mass Destruction". I never thought that the term was appropriate. The more insidious weapons are chemical and biological which kill without destroying structures or equipment. I always thought that "WMD" were better defined as "Weapons of Mass Death". I hope it sticks. Another interesting thing he mentioned was that more than 150 nations have sent aid to the Katrina AO. That's considerably more than the conservative media reported. __________________ Whale Pain and suffering are inevitable, misery is optional. http://tadahling.com/memoriesofaspecialforcessoldier/
QRQ 30 is offline