[Badger52]

Originally Posted by bubba

Now, on to repealing the ban on new manufacture of MG’s. The “history” of the 2a tells us that a group of ordinary citizens stockpiled “military arms” and picked a fight with a tyrannical super-power on a bridge in Massachusetts back in April, 1775. Since EVERY single Soldier, Sailor, Marine, and Airman is trained on and generally issued a Machine-Gun, the ordinary citizen should have access to the same.

While I don’t like or personally agree with the $200 Stamp, the complete ban on MG’s should now be viewed (at least by the courts) as un-Constitutional…..

Well... let's see what happens. ("Autokeycard" case)

A fresh U.S. Supreme Court gun-rights ruling should make a 78-year-old law regulating machine guns unconstitutional and invalidate a YouTube celebrity’s gun-crime indictment with an Orange Park man, his lawyers are arguing.

Lawyers for Matthew Hoover, a Wisconsin gun dealer whose YouTube channel has 148,000 subscribers, have asked U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard to dismiss his January indictment with Clay County resident Kristopher Ervin, who was charged last year with selling illegal machine-gun conversion equipment online.

Hoover’s lawyers asked Howard last week to rule that the National Firearms Act, a 1934 law that restricted machine gun ownership by creating a tax and license requirement on them, conflicts with the U Constitution's Second Amendment guarantee of a right to bear arms.

They argued the law violates a standard the Supreme Court used last month to decide a New York law on gun ownership was unconstitutional, so the federal law must be unconstitutional too.

LINK to Full Story