Quote:
Originally Posted by InTheBlack
1) You have to wait for the peer review. That's the way SCIENCE works. Maybe 5 papers will refute it.
2) So? Can you document this has happened in this instance? Ad-hominum arguments add nothing of value.
|
Well you asked:
Quote:
|
Do you think the Scripps people have any reason NOT to be truthful about any data indicating human design?
|
I merely offered you examples of how the truth is twisted and used for personal and ideological gain. That is not an attack, that is pointing out that is a possibility.
As for your claim the topic going off the rails with speculation. IMO, no one has a handle on how this started. The idea of a intentional release is no more speculative than it was accidental.
One thing that is becoming abundantly clear is China lied.