We may have forgotten a history lesson:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_D...nal_Convention
In retrospect, an argument could be made the Mayor Daley leveled the playing field, literally, sending the progressive agenda back 40 years.
Having experienced that time with a viewpoint that could best be described as working-class poor, the deaths of King, the 2 Kennedy's, and VN, appear much more combustible than today's frustrated metro-sexual safe space seeking beta male. Who when confronted with real phallic force, retreats to their hive.
It's a realization that only force subdues these progressive cowards. If the occasion arises that a confrontation of a conservative public servant was physically defended with brute force by a protective public, imoo, the confrontations would cease. Much like the public confronting terrorist on planes and trains. If we are going to die, die fighting to survive.
That said, some called for the same treatment of the left, imoo, there is no need to directly challenge opposition party representatives in a public quid pro quo. To do so, feeds directly into the strategy that they (progressive) use to a psychological advantage to neuter a response from the center and the right.
The progressive’s taut and act on self-defined shifting moral grounds, citing racism and xenophobic labeling, this is done to control the debate and negate all argument and challenges.
The only way forward is not argue the points, but to be like Trump, not care one iota what is said about you and continue to attack.