Quote:
Originally Posted by PSM
Well, no one has challenged it so this may do it. You know that an EO will be challenged and stopped by a judge and end up before the Court. And he changed the balance of the Court so this is actually good.
|
Concur - raising this issue is critical - as is stemming the tide of illegal border crossings. And, as you point out an EO is easy come and potentially easy go. I prefer the hard work be put in “to do it right.”
Trump has again raised a very important immigration issue that will ultimately be decided by the SCt...hopefully a more conservative SCt. And, that court with two of his nominees now sitting on the court...may just have been the “hard work” needed to get something done. And, as you say, this may ultimately be a good thing. But, I still shudder thinking about egomaniacs with phones and pens. I still have faith in the genius of separation of powers.