Quote:
Originally Posted by Brush Okie
This post is worthless without pictures 
Here is the double standard of hollyweird. I have done photography as a hobby for years. My first Camera I got at Ft. Benning PX when in jump school. In general when a photographer takes photos they are the property of the photographer with some exceptions that are agreed upon in writing before the photo shoot. So lets say some young want to be star goes and gets head shots for her portfolio. The photographer owns the photographs and she buys the prints for limited use of what they agree upon. Same goes for family photos back when they used negatives and now digital that is why you never got the negatives or a digital copy.
So all these want to be stars get nude photos done then become famous. Guess what legally the photographer can do what ever they want with the photos. Sell them, put them on porn web sites what ever. Well these stars get lawyers and get the FBI involved so they take the property of the photographer away from him without due process. The law only applies to some people. |
You are way off. That's not what happened, at least in the case of Jennifer Lawrence and the other victimized by the so-called Fappening. Those were not professional photographs.
Many young women think nothing of taking and sending nude selfies to their boyfriends. Most have their phones synced to upload photos automatically to thE cloud. Then'hackers' used social engineering to gain access to the celebrities' cloud account and steal the photos.
(I don't know about Charissa Thomas but I assume it was something similar.)