View Single Post
Old 09-25-2014, 12:59   #4
Loadsmasher
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loadsmasher View Post
This was the discussion around the office the other day. General consensus is that they will create an entirely new division hq with the corresponding senior officer billets but no actual division. It's the best of both worlds, more conventional Generals and co-opting Special Forces' mission sets!

I really hope someone slides the METL for an SF Group HQ under Odie's door this week.
I was partly wrong. They're sending the 1st ID.

http://www.armytimes.com/article/201...ll-deploy-Iraq

Guess they'll be BROing out at Riley tonight. God speed.


Unrelated, but this comment by Odierno boggles the mind.

“The complexity of the environment that we have to operate in now, and probably the next 10 to 15 to 20 years, we need these headquarters,” he said. “If you ask me one of the stress points in the Army, it’s our headquarters.”

Stress point? A headquarters is a stress point? We are deactivating BCTs left and right but the HQ's are what we need? The only stress for the HQ is the O4's and above stressing about how to get an invite to a foriegn force's bar.
__________________
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. E. Burke

Last edited by Loadsmasher; 09-25-2014 at 13:07. Reason: fuckery
Loadsmasher is offline   Reply With Quote