Quote:
Originally Posted by PSM
I understand your position, also, as I used to share it. But, I've learned a bit more over the years. Money in campaigns of congressional elections (both chambers) should not be so important, but it is because of the direct election of senators and the overly large congressional districts.
If senators (following a repeal of the 17th Amendment) were appointed by the state's legislatures, there would be no need for them to fund raise to get elected. And, if the congressional districts were reduced to the original 20 to 30 thousand citizens money would not be as important or influential.
Also, simplifying the tax code would eliminate the tax incentive legislation that money can buy.
Pat
|
So, state legislatures are free from corruption and cronyism?
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|