01-24-2014, 10:05
|
#634
|
Guerrilla
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 450
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSM
Well, you "nullification" guys must have no problem with what O and Holder are doing, then. How about what CA, NY, and IL will do if we ever get control back? In fact, lib judges use nullification every day. Prop 8 in CA, voted in by the "people", was tossed by a judge. Why have laws? Heck, why have a constitution if you are just going to ignore the parts you don't like?
Pat
|
I'll quote part of email that an constitutional attorney sent to me.
Quote:
Considering the root problem corrupting the Republic, we need to give Citizens the truth about their rights and their "public servants' " duties. Truth delayed is truth denied.
We can ill afford allowing the citizens to be misinformed about the reality of "nullification" and to be encouraged to support bills that allow the governments and the state and local officers under oath to support the Constitution to shirk their obligations.
The Constitution is not a smorgasbord that we or our public servants get to pick and choose from. The oath to support the Constitution requires the Constitution be followed in its entirety, every time in every situation.
The attitude that we can restore the Constitution and the Republic by supporting parts of it and conceding parts of it or ignoring parts of it is an immoral violation of one's oath to support the Constitution. It is like negotiating with cannibals on how much of you they are going to eat for dinner. You will always come out on the short end of that deal.
For the sake of Liberty,
Richard D. Fry
General Counsel
Patriot Coalition
Revitalizing the Second Amendment(RT2A
|
|
pcfixer is offline
|
|