Thanks Guys..
While following the links, I found this one.
Quote:
TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Insurgency in the Hood: Understanding Insurgencies Through Urban Gangs
2a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
Past, current and future military endeavors will invariably involve conflict at the sub-state level. A recurring problem in the study of insurgent conflict is a lack of data that has the readth, depth, and historical accuracy to provide insight as to why, at the individual level, people participate in insurgency. Accessibility to street gangs provides a comprehensive source of data not seen in insurgencies. Street gangs provide a “ground truth”, to the interaction between the state and organized sub-state group in a competition for control. The individuals who fuel both sides of this competition for control are basing decisions to participate in insurgency on a framework founded in rational actor theory, but modified by their perspective of the world. Groups who wish to recruit individuals into their insurgency apply incentives and disincentives selectively to individuals to compel membership. As a group gains more members it can apply more incentives, increasing the rate or future recruitment and level of control over a community. A comprehensive and effective strategy cannot be developed to counter these insurgent forces without answering the fundamental questions behind individual participation first. This thesis examines insurgency from the individual level and proposes concepts that must accompany any attempt to combat rebel groups.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a451328.pdf
|
While this may be applied to areas like LA and Chicago, the small village politics and micro-geographic fiefdoms in the sandbox have similar small scale dynamics..
Might also be worth a read following the Zimmerman case..
