View Single Post
Old 07-08-2013, 10:34   #9
pcfixer
Guerrilla
 
pcfixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 450
http://theothermccain.com/2013/07/06...ous-questions/

Very possibly tin foil, but in the age of BO's transparency the writer does ask some good questions.

Looking at Lisa Jennings’ article at ViralRead now, obviously it needs an update to clarify the facts, but that’s OK. There are ways to report a story like that — where the accuracy is unknown and the sources are dubious — with the appropriate skepticism. And I’ve reached out to a source on Capitol Hill to see if I can find out exactly what Congress knows about FEMA’s deal with the Russians.

This story does indeed raise serious questions:
Why has FEMA allowed this practice of “pseudo-transparency” to continue to the point that it becomes necessary for the agency to officially deny Internet rumors like this?

Is there any reason why FEMA could not have published the text of its protocol agreements with Russia?

And if these protocols could have been published, why weren’t they?

Why did it take more than two weeks after the Vladivostok meeting last October for FEMA to publish a press release about it?

And why has FEMA still not published anything on its Web site about its June 25 meeting with the Russians in Washington?
pcfixer is offline   Reply With Quote