Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Hey Dreadnought, instead of floating around this site trying to poke long time members and asking Bull Shit questions why don't you make a post where you state you're opinion - and then back it up with links to facts.
So your next post should start something like "I support the main idea of the article because............" followed by links supporting your position.
Or the next time you'll find yourself having to post elsewhere.
|
It isn't a bullshit question, it's seeking clarification on a stance, and I'm not trying to poke anybody. I don't know what Richard was specifically referring to when he said his comment, and I did not want to give my opinion on something if he was referring something else, basically.
As far as the article is concerned, I think that the banning of "sodomy" is an archaic aspect of the UCMJ and needs to be done away with, as well as the banning of consensual sex between two armed service members of the same gender, what with the repeal of DADT and all.
There are other issues in the article though, such as the inclusion of bestiality laws, changes to both of them, reception and action by political groups, etc. Wasn't sure what Richard was referring to so I asked for clarification before giving an unwanted or irrelevant opinion.