Nope. Is it not obvious by the curvature of the magazine?
This is not generally the AK-74. This is Saiga-MK 7.62x39. Of course, you are unlikely to follow the development of my hobby throughout the network, with bated breath. Sorry, I had to understand it. But it shows in the picture, anyway.
I was not trying to achieve similarities with existing in-service models. It so happened that the Saiga-MK produced in the AK-74 form-factor. Rather it is civil version of 7.62x39 AK-103. My building does not have a preliminary plan and is designed to be a comfortable rifle. Army ammunition is illegal for civilians here, by the way.
About setup:
- EOTech EXPS 3-0 (recent purchase);
- Fort gas tube (ukrainian UltiMAK analogue);
- FAB Defence handguard;
- Noname front handle;
- Hogue pistol grip;
- SVDS buttstock with turnable cheek;
- Finnish KRS silencer;
- RPK rear sight with windage adjustments;
It is too early to talk about cowitness with these irons or with this scope. Still a lot to buy. Like TWS dog leg and Magpul back up sights… The question of what to do with the existing front sight. Hemorrhoids, in a word.
But first, I have to convince myself in need of this cowitness at all, given the quick-detachable EOTech.
Another scope? Mayby later. I do not so much need this cowitness.
In passport weapon accuracy is specified like 138 mm at 100 m.
Shooting this rifle “from box” at 100 meters with open sight showed better accuracy in 87 mm. And 52 mm with POSP optics.
I tried to gather a group with this weapon a couple of times, but it's a hopeless task. Kalash needed to hit a growth or machine-gun-crew targets at distances up to 400 meters, and not for the gathering of groups. Strange that I explain it to you.
Much more interesting dynamic shooting iron gongs at ranges of 50-100 meters for me. I'm saving a lot of time so, getting mainly shooting instead of walking hither and thither.
Schließlich genau erklären, was konkret Sie komisch scheinen?
