Quote:
Originally Posted by MSRlaw
I strongly advocated for the initial SVA but the problem was that it criminalized lying, in and of itself. The problem with the new law, is the inverse of the old, is the determination of value of the concurrent fraud.
$0.02
Marc
|
Lying has been "criminalized" for a long time already, just lie to a law enforcement officer.
You're not going to find a DA in the country that will prosecute any of the sections of the SVA except for maybe the Medal of Honor. So this signing of the new SVA is just about useless, (just like the fella that signed it).
It's a moot point, you can lie and pretend to be anyone you want to be except a law enforcement officer......
Trust me the only reason the FBI went after William "Bill" Hillar was because he scammed the FBI..... It had nothing to do with the SVA.