|
Clearly we have different ideas of what diplomacy means.
...surrendering defense technology unless there is a BIG payoff to benefit the USA doesn't define diplomacy for me. If it was real diplomacy, why the 'cloak and dagger' delay until after the elections?
He clearly saw his "diplomacy" as something that would not be received well by his countrymen or else he wouldn't have had to wait until there was no recourse by the voters. If it is such a good idea, why not jump on it pre-election and ride his artful deal with the Soviets to an easy election victory?
...or we could cover up Benghazi, pinky promise a compromise of our defense technology, and get the IRS to help sell class warfare.
I'm not an educated guy, I dont understand the "enlightened" decision making process used by our elected officials so I just have to go with my gut.
My gut tells me "its bad for ya'"
__________________
Opinions stated in this post are solely those of the author, and in no way reflect the opinions or policies of The Department of Defense, The United States Army, The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, The Screen Actors Guild, The Boy Scouts, The Good, The Bad, or The Ugly. These opinions are provided purely as overly sarcastic social commentary and are not meant to be used for mission planning or navigation.
"Make sure your own mask is secure before assisting others"
-Airplane Safety Briefing
|