Quote:
Originally Posted by Broadsword2004
How does it make Darwinism false? It shows that wholly different species can evolve over a period of generations of changes in the life form. Also, the definition of "species" is a bit arbitrary: LINK |
when we artificially create a major mutation...crossing cows with buffalo...the offspring cannot reproduce...iotw, lets's say a 'natural' mutation of major hox DNA happened...the result would not reproduce...the mutation would die out, that is the barrier DNA has within it's own code.
Darwinism says apes became men at some point...that would require a modification of hox dna (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hox_gene) that would entail huge major modification and additions to DNA...as in the mating of beef/buffalo...this mutation process does not work as it produces non reproductive issue...ergo...the mutation dies without reproducing.
So, you tell me, with the barrier code and the protective DNA wall, how did apes become men?
If you choose to believe this theory works, without any proof whatsoever, have at it. Nothing you've put forth is considered quantifiable scientifically.
I'd suggest looking into the genome process a bit more as it really explains the dif between micro/macro mutation.
Also be a bit more specific with species, sub species as you use the term loosely.
I can get a dog to walk upright, however, the hox gene that dictates the angle of pelvic girdle, femur length and articulation are very specific to mammals that are designed to walk upright and those that can periodically do so but predominately are quadrupeds....i.e. when really moving they go to all 4's.