That's because I am older than 47

....I'll look into that, looks interesting, the theory of it.
Can she, or does she, point to a definitive example in the macro sense or is she postulating at this point.
Being widely 'accepted' as a theory doesn't overy impress as Darwinism is so widely 'accepted' in the same vein.
If there is macro proof then that is a totally dif story.
Trapper, break it down for me in a nutshell....how has her theory changed the then know operational DNA experience of natural barrier, and mutation and natural selection?