Quote:
Originally Posted by (1VB)compforce
For the most part I agree with your analysis. Here are the questions I have for you:
|
Thank you.
Quote:
|
1. How long do you believe it will take to for the current and future administrations to dismantle our way of life to the degree that it can't be undone? (Assuming that we aren't there yet)
|
Until martial law is declared. Kidding aside, I take the long view. We effect change. Should events not go our way, we continue. We never, never ever give up.
And neither will they.
Quote:
|
2. How long do you think it would take to effect the type of ground-up institutional change you suggest?
|
How long would it take to retrain writers and producers and get a TV show on air? A dozen different educational initiatives and town halls (in each state) could start in less than six weeks; within six months, in each county. I estimate that it will take two years to fully retrain the GOP and begin effecting real change in the party. Remember, the Tea Party movement was up and surging in less than six weeks.
Quote:
|
3. Would the building of institutional changes affect the timeline to question #1 or would it be too little, too late...and why do you think so?
|
Yes. See #1.
Quote:
|
4. If, based on the answers to the above, you believe there is time for this change, how would you begin the groundswell given that changing 1 or 2 people's minds at a time has very little real effect on an election. How would you suggest marketing the knowledge given the funding from Perot?
|
Someone with funds would need to craft a plan, gather planners to refine the plan, gather organizers in every state to grow the organization and implement the plan. It is UW. Read Mao, Uncle Ho, and the old SF Operations and Techniques manual.
Quote:
|
5. If you don't believe there is time to effect this type of change, how would you accelerate the timeline, given Perot's theoretical investment?
|
Secession. Certainly don't want to go there and do not actually see that happening in any of our lifetimes. Lets concentrate on what we can do to prevent 'possibilities' from occurring.