WWF Logo
I have read the article(s) about the WWF refusal to “accept” the contribution from the church, and concluded that the issue is not the contribution,
but the churches use of the WWF logo in its fund raising efforts.
If the WWF allows the logo to be used,
it infers that the Wounded Warriors Foundation supports the FUND RAISING efforts of the organization.
This allows (insert organization here) to claim “We Support the WWF” and use the WWF logo in publicizing their solicitation / cause.
This scenario would allow any organization to collect contributions under the banner of WWF, and use / misuse the LOGO at their discretion --- say 95% admin, or 50% to someone’s mistress /boyfriend.
If the church wanted to make a contribution, they could do just that---- contribute to WWF – but NOT use the logo or allude approval from the WWF.
Sounds like mendacity to me.
Snt