Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

Achilles · 11-19-2004, 12:20

I don't think it would be possible for us to put a conservative person in the SecGen position. Remember the countries we are dealing with. Much of the UN is composed of Cheese-or-Kraut-eating-surrender-monkeys. Clinton would be a HELL of a lot better than Kofi Annan or some China-backed shithead. If its either him or some communist I'd vote for him. Lesser of two evils. The UN still wouldn't be as pro-active in preventing (and stomping out) terrorism as we would like to see, but at least they would no longer silently condone it as they do now. I do not like Clinton either but he could turn the UN from a "monument of hypocrisy" to a somewhat useful organization.

Just my .02

11-19-2004, 12:20	#5
Achilles SF Candidate Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: ATX Posts: 211	I don't think it would be possible for us to put a conservative person in the SecGen position. Remember the countries we are dealing with. Much of the UN is composed of Cheese-or-Kraut-eating-surrender-monkeys. Clinton would be a HELL of a lot better than Kofi Annan or some China-backed shithead. If its either him or some communist I'd vote for him. Lesser of two evils. The UN still wouldn't be as pro-active in preventing (and stomping out) terrorism as we would like to see, but at least they would no longer silently condone it as they do now. I do not like Clinton either but he could turn the UN from a "monument of hypocrisy" to a somewhat useful organization. Just my .02 __________________ "If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his sincere friend." -Abraham Lincoln Last edited by Achilles; 11-19-2004 at 12:40.
Achilles is offline