|
It seems the administration believes it can do what it will with ammunition as it wasn't mentioned in the second amendment.
I believe that is an argument that will/should fail. It's belief that the founding fathers wanted the citizen the right to own and bear arms but not the ability to use them. It's like a law that would allow the consumption of beverages but make liquids illegal and regulate containers to remain sealed closed.
It would be as foolish as stating the right to bear arms didn't actually describe firearms. The intent is clearly weapons including firearms and the ability to own and use them, including load and fire them.
I'll be making comms with my representatives.
Last edited by sf11b_p; 01-02-2013 at 12:30.
|