Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy L-bach
...let them have their Nintendo money. It was OK to let them play roles in a movie - hell it was encouraged and defended. It was OK to parade them in front of the media on the first place and nobody had any problems with that. Maybe the video game will have a function that lets you build a wide range of characters to assault that famous compound in Abbottabad!!!! Look at the big picture, we could use this video game to desensitize the force to gender integration in SOF as well by giving the option to let 'gamers' play as a female commando, or CST !!!
We could even use it to help provide broader acceptance of the ending of DADT by having a playable gender neutral character named "Chaz"
Its just a video game, what harm can it be?
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
LET THEM PLAY
|
Funny you mentioned that because the final mission in the game is a joint CAG-ST6 raid against the main villain of the game, whose compound is in Pakistan.
The game has received poor ratings from critics.I think the role of SEALs assisting was quite clear when the trailers of the game were released.
Now I have a question, are SF/SOF personnel allowed to have any professional engagements in the civvie world while they are Active Duty?Because if they aren't then weren't these soldiers afraid of the consequences if they'd get caught?