Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor
The admins here in the past have directed that merely posting a link or article without any commentary by the poster should be avoided as much as possible. Thus, whether we agree with the opinion or not, the poster is indeed following PS.com protocol here.
|
I think most of us agree with the fact that the poster was well within protocol, and his rights as an individual, to post the comment(s) he did, sardonic or not. What some of us would like is for him to step up and:
a) admit he was wrong, or partially wrong, in his characterization of the moderator,
or
b) provide specific examples - such as the number of times each candidate was interrupted - to back up his claims.
Stating that it's "water under the bridge" or that "I've moved on" sounds more like what the Ds do when things don't go their way.
As for me, I'll paraphrase Adlai Stevenson at the UN in October, 1961:
"Don't wait for the translation. Answer 'yes' or 'no'. I'm prepared to wait until hell freezes over."