Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
This isn't the time to practice your Congressional testimony
This is your thread you picked the tune; now it's time to pay the band
You say you do not care now. Really you just don't want to be held responsible for your actions. What you did here was a deliberate attempt to pre-spin this event by questioning a professional's integrity on the flimsiest basis. What you did here was wrong.
But now, after you failed to achieve your goal of destroying her integrity it all becomes a small thing to you. We are talking about Integrity. Integrity is not a small thing. Tonyz, I'm talking about YOUR integrity. These are your words that opened this thread.
Time to man up.
Time to accept the consequences, take responsibility and make amends.
A post addressed to Ms Raddatz is the proper way to close this thread.
|
Being informed as to the possible direction of a moderator's political leanings may be of interest - even if you do not "see" a bias.
If that is not of interest to you - so be it.
But, your personal attacks on the report and those who report is also of interest.
That debate is over.
I posted the information that the MSM was reluctant to post. The information regarding a prior relationship between the moderator and the president - may or may not go to a bias. The potential for bias based on a prior relationship was raised as a discussion question and I take responsibility for raising that question in the first post.
FWIW if Romney had gone to law school with the moderator - had appointed the moderators ex and had attended the moderator's wedding I think folks should know - and I think a discussion of possible bias based on a past relationship is fair game. YMMV.