Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
To your first comment
Now it doesn't matter, now. After ... Why doesn't it matter? Cuz your guy didn't need the drop gun you left behind the toilet? After enduring this thread of yours I really want your evaluation of Ms Raddatz's efforts.
|
The point of raising the issue of Raddatz's prior relationship with the sitting president was one of transparency - and raising the issue of the mere possibility of impropriety - certainly not one of preparation or competence. To follow your Godfather routine..."I wanted you to see what she's got under her fingernails."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
To your other comment, do you agree that she met this standard? If not I'm very interested in your critique of her moderating. Try not to muddy the water by commenting on the debaters.
|
IMO, Raddatz interrupted Ryan a number of times when he was making his points. That is in the past. I do not blame the referee for the result. It is what it is.
I assume that she was prepared.
As for neutrality - MOO, I would have preferred that there be a Republican, a Democrat and a true Independent on that stage. If not an actual Democrat, Raddataz certainly possess many of the indicia of a Democrat.
With the dominance of 2 party politics - IMO, it might be interesting to watch a debate where a true independent questions/probes/exposes both sides. After all, both sides own the current shit that we are in.
I am not interested in some political "fluffer" from either party moderating such an important debate.
YMMV.