Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
As Pete prudently points out Wiki (as any other reporting agency) should be read with an open and critical mind. In this case the references appear extensive, broad and deep.
Seems like a logical progression: The mission need a guy on the inside, he had the credintials to get inside, the mission went well, he was forced to bolt (but, on his own). Post mission, State naturalize and penalizes Pakistan for the prosecution and punishment. Points do seem to line up. And the question seems valid, why WASN'T this guy protected?
Always Askew Aliteration.
|
Back in 2003 when Saddam Hussein's son's were eliminated ,the owner of they house where they were hiding was moved to the US and given US Citizenship.
Op. Neptune Spear was definitely more important than the one I stated above,its job was to take out the no.1 Target.It should be safe to assume that the doctor might have been given the same opportunity to flee Pakistan safely by the Agency.Now did he refuse it(there were sources that stated he refused the offer),if he did,he should have been explained the consequences because leak or no leak the ISI would have figured out his role.
The administration is at fault because all the details,the doctors,CIA agents monitoring with cameras and all shouldn't have been released.
The rotten part is the Hollywood part,it is beyond horrible to call these fantasy-land tossers for all this.
My question is:Was it wrong just to mention the name of the unit that carried out the Op?? or the correct thing should have been a simple acknowledgement that "US Forces carried out a raid that killed OBL",that's it and end of story.