View Single Post
Old 09-10-2012, 04:35   #7
Dozer523
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue02hd View Post
Are you eff'ing serious?
As Pete prudently points out Wiki (as any other reporting agency) should be read with an open and critical mind. In this case the references appear extensive, broad and deep.
Seems like a logical progression: The mission need a guy on the inside, he had the credintials to get inside, the mission went well, he was forced to bolt (but, on his own). Post mission, State naturalize and penalizes Pakistan for the prosecution and punishment. Points do seem to line up. And the question seems valid, why WASN'T this guy protected?

Always Askew Aliteration.
Dozer523 is offline   Reply With Quote