Quote:
Originally posted by ODA 564
Not to critize...
But coming from the days when we thought having M-16A2s was 'high speed' and the standard optic was the Mk. I eyeball...
I have a Trijicon Reflex sight on my rifle and find it more than useable under all conditions - when the alternative is iron sights and the 1954 model (modified 1996) of the MK. I eyeball, hazel, 2 ea.
Using an 'A2' reciever (i.e. carrying handle), it co-witnesses my iron sights.
Mine is the battery-less model.
Superior training and marksmanship is the deciding factor (IMHO) over Hajis using AKs, crappy AK iron sights, and 'spray and pray' as their TTP.
The old 'quick kill', using iron sights on an M-16, will produce an outstanding reactive shooter.
Of course, a better sight helps. But the man is the weapon; the rifle and sight only the tool.
|
There is no way I can disagree with your post. I will add some proper context to my query. At the time of the original post, we were in the middle of Advanced Marksmanship Training. While we trained extensively with the flip-up iron sights, we saw the tremendous value that could be found in a reflex sight in a very low light environment with short distance engagements. It allows for both eyes to be open as well which enhances situational awareness. I believe SF to be one of the few organizations in the Army that marries tough and realistic advanced marksmanship with the available technology to produce a shooter that can operate with, or without the benefit of optics.
... but, we still want those EOTECHS
