Quote:
Originally Posted by vorticity
If.....Again, respectfully, that's not an issue either Watts or I address. Ideally, that's a policy issue to be decided by government, using the most accurate observations possible. MOO, quasi-scientific 'analysis' by folk like Watts muddy, rather than clarify, that issue. .......
|
Not so I think.
I think it looks more like - Well, we have really good long term data from this stations - even though they report higher temps - we'll just keep using them - because - well - we've been using them a long time.
The longer you use bad data the more you can bend the Hockey Stick.
Government decides? Come on quit kidding around. This whole thread is about what government thinks - and government is in the tank for AGW.