|
Lots of good discussion and solid perspectives in the comments section.
I don't think this particular 2nd/3rd order effect was mentioned though:
I've been working with double, triple amputees, 50% and above TBSA burns fresh from the downrange (yep, draw down or not, US soldiers, marines, usw are still paying the price). We have severly injured (amputees etc.) female soldiers, but I never recall seeing them shown in full head to what's left in any publications/documentary/orientation videos of the wounded warrior care.
Why is this? Is it a mere discretion? Is the American public ready for it, mogadishu mixed with PVT Lynch? Are the social engineers with frequent visits from good idea fairies ready for it? Is the CST in the article ready for it?
It's all fun and games, until harsh reality sinks in
I am all for counting the cost (worst case scenario), doing one's best, and having no regret. This is biased and sure is emotional, but will glady admit I am not ready for it. I recall when I worked with the CST MAJ injured in training, and I picture if it was her on that bed with half body practically missing, foley, ostomy, ETT/trach, NGT, open belly and what remains of limbs covered with wvac, multiple wounds left open with packing, multiple sharpnel still in the body, eyes either showing blank stares or silent scream of pain during dressing change/eschar debridement....
Not that I'm glad it's a guy not a gal, but those having been there can relate I'm sure
__________________
"we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope" Rom. 5:3-4
"So we can suffer, and in suffering we know who we are" David Goggins
"Aide-toi, Dieu t'aidera " Jehanne, la Pucelle
Der, der Geld verliert, verliert einiges;
Der, der einen Freund verliert, verliert viel mehr;
Der, der das Vertrauen verliert, verliert alles.
INDNJC
|