http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/us...eme-court.html
In some of the accounts I have read concerning the arguments I had to wonder how they were being interpeted by the judges. I guess one can read into this as much as one wants to but I gather that for the most part the judges do not think too highly of those who make wild claims regarding past heroics. It almost sounds to me that (in the eyes of the court) this comes down to, was it lying, was it an act of fraud or is it just free speech? I hope that the law is upheld by the justices and that this is not seen solely as a freedom of speech issue.