I took the article to read that, after a forthcoming review of women's roles in the Oz armed forces which was brought about by an investigation of male bahaviors towards female soldiers, there may be some women allowed to train for certain combat roles which have been closed to them up to now...as long as they fully qualify for them.
I think the article's headline causes one to have a pretty strong emotional response before it is even read by omitting a needed question mark and, thus, making it a declarative statement whch would indicate a decision has already been made.
"Australian women destined for frontline combat" vs "Australian women destined for frontline combat?" offer two very different meanings and responses to how one approaches the article...but I guess question marks for headlines don't sell papers.
And so it goes...
Richard