|
BANNED USER
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western NC
Posts: 1,243
|
Quote:
|
What is the root problem between the Muslim world and the West?
|
IMO, Islamic ideology codified by Sharia...and the lack of reformation...
It's interesting to see what the above Arab Columnists say, held up against what Islamic Law says. Those interviewed seem to be in compliance with Sharia
r8.2 The Prophet said, "He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good {Islam/Sharia} or says something commendable is not a liar." "I did not hear him permit untruth in anything people say, except for three things: war, settling disagreements, and a man talking with his wife... (A: in smoothing over differences)"
"...it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible....,and obligatory to lie if he goal is obligatory..." {Jihad - in the cause of Allah}
(Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law - pgs 744-748)
http://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Trave.../dp/0915957728
Quote:
“Arab Columnists: Stop Talking About Offensive Jihad”
Khaled Al-Ghanami, states that the “wiser” supporters of offensive jihad believe that Muslims “must sit and wait until the era of our strength returns.” In the meantime, according to these Muslims, “there is nothing shameful about taqiyya [deception] until the time is ripe.” Al-Ghanami bemoans the fact that such Muslims operate naively “on the assumption that the world doesn’t read, doesn’t monitor … and is not paying attention to the calls for killing, tyranny, and aggression that we are spreading.”
"...Abdallah Al-Naggar writes: “Today, the Muslims’ circumstances are different [i.e., they are weak], and talk of this aspect [of jihad] requires a smart approach, one that stresses the aspect of self defense, instead of aggression and onslaught,” since discussing offensive jihad “arouses the enmity of people”; thus, “there is a need for wisdom [i.e., kitman] in our impassioned discussions of war and battles.”
|
TRUCES
o9. 16 (2) Truces are permissible, not obligatory…..
…..for it is a matter of gravest consequence because it entails the nonperformance of JIHAD….
There must be some interest served in making a truce {weakness} other than mere preservation of the status quo. Allah Most High says,
..So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35)
Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of numbers or material, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before his time was up.
If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary…
(Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law - pgs 604-605)
http://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Trave.../dp/0915957728
Quote:
|
"...humans disagree over any number of socio-cultural principles, all humans — secular or religious, Muslim or non-Muslim — agree that being forced to uphold a particular lifestyle against their will is unquestionably wrong, bringing us right back to our topic: the purpose of offensive jihad is to do just that — forcefully impose a particular way of life on non-Muslims, culminating with dhimmitude for those who, after being conquered, refuse to convert."
|
{Kufr - Kafir - Kafiroon = Death}
f1.3 Someone...denies something…which there is scholarly consensus…is executed for his unbelief…{Kufr/Kafir/Kafiroon}
o4.17 There is no indemnity for killing a non-Muslim…{Kafir/Kafiroon}
o8.3 If he is a freeman, no one besides the caliph or his representative may kill him. If someone else kills him, the killer is either disciplined (def17) (O: for arrogating the caliph’s prerogative and encroaching upon his rights, as this is one of his duties).
(A: though if there is no Caliph (def: o25), no permission is required.
o8.7 (7) to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it;
(2) to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future…
(3) to speak words that imply unbelief…
(14) to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma’, def: b7) is part of Islam…
(20) or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24)
The Objectives of Jihad
o9.0
(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.
o9.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others.
o9.8 "...and if they will not {revert/convert}, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the the non-Muslim poll tax (Jizya, def: o11.4) which is the significance of their paying it....." {to spare the life of the Kafir/Kafiroon}
w4.0 THE FINALITY OF THE PROPHET’S MESSAGE
"...it is unbelief (KUFR) to hold that the remnant cults now bearing the names of formerly valid religions, such as “Christianity” or “Judaism,” are acceptable to Allah Most High after He has sent the final messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) to the entire world (dis: o8.7(20).
(Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law - pgs 109, 595-598, 599-606, 846-852)
http://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Trave.../dp/0915957728
The Islamic ideological driven events across the globe to impose a Theo-Religious-Political system upon others are simply staggering. In my mind, the historical parallels of Islamism to 1923-1945 Nazi Germany are astonishing. Islam is an incarnation of fascist totalitarianism.
IMHO, the denial of hiding one's head in the sand of this phenomenon by the likes of WaPo's Frankie Martin, Keith Olbermann, Katie Couric, Campbell Brown, and the vast majority of the Liberal MSM dhimmis will not change either the situation or the threat, and will not make it go away, but only encourage it. Surrender and Dhimmitude is not an option.
Nosce Hostem > http://wolfpangloss.files.wordpress....ept-of-war.pdf
Last edited by T-Rock; 10-29-2010 at 03:44.
|