View Single Post
Old 08-31-2010, 23:54   #3
6.8SPC_DUMP
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 353
IMHO it makes sense that Anti-Foreign sentiment will grow in developed nations who needed foreign workers during the growth times and now can't find work and have massive debt.

Cutting off all state and fed aid to those who didn't get here legally (child born here or not), while making it law that employers who have illegal EE's have to fire them if any citizens want their jobs, might help here.

Years back when people were talking about the "North American Union" and the "Amero" the rational given was to include Canada for their natural resources and Mexico for their cheap labor. Sounds less far fetched now.

Does NorthCom covering those areas, but AZ getting sued, seem logical to that end?

The "Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes" E.O. in July 19, 2010 resulted in the (7/19/10) Final Recommendations of the Ocean Policy Task Force (1),(2) that we should join the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (L.O.S.T).

Part XI, sections 1-5, are interesting. Link
Quote:
Negotiated in the 1970s, the treaty was heavily influenced by the "New International Economic Order," a set of economic principles first formally advanced at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). That agenda called for "fairer" terms of trade and development financing for the so-called under-developed and developing nations.

Another way the New International Economic Order has been described is "redistributionist." Link
The UN would tax and regulate all offshore oil/mineral retrieval controlled by the “International Seabed Authority”.

The 7/26/10 Enbridge oil spill in Michigan’s Kalamazoo River, where almost a million gallons of oil was sent towards the Great Lakes, didn't get much press with BP's GOM spill going on.(1),(2) The two spills do connect us to both Mexico and Canada.

Sorry for going off topic.
6.8SPC_DUMP is offline   Reply With Quote