Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post - War On Terror's Other Cost: Undeserved Anger At All Muslims

Penn · 08-07-2010, 15:16

Checking out at Costco this morning, a mother and son were in front of me. She had her head covered, they spoke Arabic together. While she placed her grocery on the counter, the son, in his Rutgers shorts, texted; spoke fluent English on his cell, with a nasal NJ accent, there is no doubt an American raised young man.

The only one thought that crossed my mind: As an American, I wondered were his loyalties laid.

A breach of trust occurred. It continues to split the relationship between muslim and all other non muslims, by the refusal of muslim people and cleric’s worldwide to assist in the capture of bin laden and the rest of his ilk.

Your defense, and for that matter anyone defense of: “Not all muslims are terrorist” is incorrect.

All muslims are culpable due to the continued silence in denouncing the wanton slaughter of innocent people, not to mention the easy denouncement in the wholesale killing of children.

There is no movement, as in protest, in the muslim community worldwide to confront its radical cleric’s inciting hate and advocating the killing of innocent people. The logic being: non muslims do not matter, jihad is a cultural impetrative, and to do so would be putting their life on the line, by not adhering to Islamic doctrine.

If not all muslim support terrorism, or are not sympatric to terrorism, then why is there not a worldwide movement by muslim; let’s say on the order of the anti-war movement in the 1960’s and early 1970’s, that developed in America and worldwide to stop the war.

Surly with a billion muslim worldwide, statistically speaking of course, there should be some form of protest movement?

Except for the fact of the, 999,900,999 million illiterate muslims the power elite refuses to educate.

The defense of muslim ideology, or muslims as “not all are terrorist”, fails the accessory test in all capital cases. As a former LEO, silence automatically makes one a co-conspirator; therefore, in the execution of any terrorist acts that wantonly kill innocent people, all muslims are implicated by association affirmed in their silence, which translates as condoning the action.

08-07-2010, 15:16	#143
Penn Area Commander Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3,484	Checking out at Costco this morning, a mother and son were in front of me. She had her head covered, they spoke Arabic together. While she placed her grocery on the counter, the son, in his Rutgers shorts, texted; spoke fluent English on his cell, with a nasal NJ accent, there is no doubt an American raised young man. The only one thought that crossed my mind: As an American, I wondered were his loyalties laid. A breach of trust occurred. It continues to split the relationship between muslim and all other non muslims, by the refusal of muslim people and cleric’s worldwide to assist in the capture of bin laden and the rest of his ilk. Your defense, and for that matter anyone defense of: “Not all muslims are terrorist” is incorrect. All muslims are culpable due to the continued silence in denouncing the wanton slaughter of innocent people, not to mention the easy denouncement in the wholesale killing of children. There is no movement, as in protest, in the muslim community worldwide to confront its radical cleric’s inciting hate and advocating the killing of innocent people. The logic being: non muslims do not matter, jihad is a cultural impetrative, and to do so would be putting their life on the line, by not adhering to Islamic doctrine. If not all muslim support terrorism, or are not sympatric to terrorism, then why is there not a worldwide movement by muslim; let’s say on the order of the anti-war movement in the 1960’s and early 1970’s, that developed in America and worldwide to stop the war. Surly with a billion muslim worldwide, statistically speaking of course, there should be some form of protest movement? Except for the fact of the, 999,900,999 million illiterate muslims the power elite refuses to educate. The defense of muslim ideology, or muslims as “not all are terrorist”, fails the accessory test in all capital cases. As a former LEO, silence automatically makes one a co-conspirator; therefore, in the execution of any terrorist acts that wantonly kill innocent people, all muslims are implicated by association affirmed in their silence, which translates as condoning the action. Last edited by Penn; 08-07-2010 at 15:54.
Penn is offline