Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

blue02hd · 07-30-2010, 03:49

If anyone has to introduce a new system in order to fire a new round, it is irresponsible to label it "Lightweight Ammo" . The reality is that it is BOTH a new platform and new ammunition combined. Chance of that getting off the ground? Zero. And I agree, lighter does not equal better.

I don't see this making very much traction what so ever, especially when you look at what happened to the SCAR.

Tango Uniform, you don't write for Rolling Stones do you?

07-30-2010, 03:49	#4
blue02hd Quiet Professional Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Near the flag pole Posts: 1,168	If anyone has to introduce a new system in order to fire a new round, it is irresponsible to label it "Lightweight Ammo" . The reality is that it is BOTH a new platform and new ammunition combined. Chance of that getting off the ground? Zero. And I agree, lighter does not equal better. I don't see this making very much traction what so ever, especially when you look at what happened to the SCAR. Tango Uniform, you don't write for Rolling Stones do you? __________________ "It's not my aim, it's these damn crooked bullets,,," Verified Tax Payer and Future Sex Symbol Last edited by blue02hd; 07-30-2010 at 04:09.
blue02hd is offline