Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaba
IMO, your own analysis disproves your central thesis.
The current administration's efforts to propagate middle class (bourgeoisie) interests and values is more indicative of an attempt to subvert the working classes from their revolutionary mission.
Moreover, IMO you are neglecting the role violence plays in Marxist-Leninist ideology. To Marx, "class warfare" was not a rhetorical flourish but a necessary component of revolutionary change.
Finally, before someone argues that today's "progressive" is yesterday's socialist, and therefore a communist, I would point out that while communist ideology allows for temporary alliances of convenience with leftist political parties, it points out that such arrangements must ultimately serve the objectives of communism, and, that at all times.
My $0.02.
__________________________________________________ ___________
* Source is here. |
Are you suggesting that today’s Progressive is not yesterdays Progressive?
Perhaps it is clear to those who want the change that a revolution could only come in response to anarchy. But an evolution could be achieved via social change…
*Saul Alinsky; Rules for Radicals
*The Invisible Committee; The Coming Insurrection