View Single Post
Old 11-17-2009, 12:04   #7
PedOncoDoc
Area Commander
 
PedOncoDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Northeast Utah
Posts: 1,712
I'd like to see what the government is proposing for women who are considered higher than average risk (due to personal and family history among other things). This important (and substantial) population was not addressed in either article.

I'd also like to see statistics regarding breast cancer from other countries - many variables including air quality, sun/UV exposure and diet which vary based on geographical region and culture have shown to have major impacts on cancer epidemiology. For example, ther Japanese have a mich higher risk for stomach cancer, felt to be due to the large amount of smoked fish in their diet; the payoff is decreased cardiovascular disease.

Also, copmparing our health system's outcomes to those of other nations is comparing apples to oranges. Access to - and quality of health care changes outcomes as well.
__________________
‎"The dignity of man is not shattered in a single blow, but slowly softened, bent, and eventually neutered. Men are seldom forced to act, but are constantly restrained from acting. Such power does not destroy outright, but prevents genuine existence. It does not tyrannize immediately, but it dampens, weakens, and ultimately suffocates, until the entire population is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid, uninspired animals, of which the government is shepherd." - Alexis de Tocqueville
PedOncoDoc is offline   Reply With Quote