View Single Post
Old 11-10-2009, 08:50   #19
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,827
I am seeing a big disconnect in the logic here.

Why are you assuming that the only soldiers who do or would bring weapons on post and carry concealed are those who would be CCW holders?

Did Hasan have a CCW for Ft Hood? Did the lack of one stop him?

Can a soldier with PTSD not just tuck his weapon in his belt and bring it on post already? Would the numbers of these people really go up if we had a an installation CCW? We are talking about bases with hundreds of access points, not an airport. I can already illegally bring a concealed weapon on post and carry it into one of the clubs. Why would a selected number of trained CCW personnel increase the number of illegally armed soldiers?

Your logic is the same that the anti-CCW community uses, Triman.

And I would stack the training and qualifications of many members of this board against yours. Should you lose your right to carry concealed because of that?

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote