Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

Fiercely Loyal · 11-10-2009, 05:58

I am sorry Triman19 but i very very much disagree with your point.

You can trust these soldiers to be armed overseas 24/7 for a year or more at a time (pre, during, and post traumatic events) and then strip that trust once they have come home to make the right decision?

The point of mandatory training is to ensure you are getting mature decision makers that have the ability to protect themselves and others. It is a process. It should weed out those who should not be carrying. Simple fact is had a CCW holder been there and armed a lot less folks would have been hurt in ALL of the mass shooting scenarios.

Not to digress from the original topic of a Federal CCW I can understand how folks would not want any FED / STATE fiascos. Instead you would like to see simply a Federal CCW for installations correct?

11-10-2009, 05:58	#12
Fiercely Loyal Guerrilla Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 165	I am sorry Triman19 but i very very much disagree with your point. You can trust these soldiers to be armed overseas 24/7 for a year or more at a time (pre, during, and post traumatic events) and then strip that trust once they have come home to make the right decision? The point of mandatory training is to ensure you are getting mature decision makers that have the ability to protect themselves and others. It is a process. It should weed out those who should not be carrying. Simple fact is had a CCW holder been there and armed a lot less folks would have been hurt in ALL of the mass shooting scenarios. Not to digress from the original topic of a Federal CCW I can understand how folks would not want any FED / STATE fiascos. Instead you would like to see simply a Federal CCW for installations correct? __________________ It's not who I am, but what I do, that defines me. Last edited by Fiercely Loyal; 11-10-2009 at 06:02.
Fiercely Loyal is offline