Thread: Joule
View Single Post
Old 07-01-2004, 12:25   #8
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,835
Re: where I got it.

Quote:
Originally posted by NG_M4_Shooter
Actually TS, I got that definition here:

http://chemistry.about.com/library/g...tm?terms=joule

I was reading some article a while back (yesm, grunts read too) about the amount of joules certain armor can withstand. I forgot about it. Then recently bought a book, a biography about Maj. Boyd (inventor OODA). The book sort of inspired me to look into the science of things, as he did.

So, had some free time, and thought I'd compare the amount of joules a given weapon produces, using different bullets. In this case an AK 105 with a 12 inch barrel. I compared 7.62, and 5.56 fired from the same weapon, using the muzzle velocity info from charts by Kalishnikov.

I thought I had determined that it would be much more devastating to be shot with the 7.62 than the 5.56 at point blank range. But I will now have to go and do the math over, double check definitions of joules.
Back to the drawing board.

Kinetic energy does not equate to energy transferred to the target, nor does it account for the wounding mechanism of the projectile's contruction.

In theory, a 6.8 oz. softball (193 grams) hitting you at 10 meters/second should damage you more than a 1 oz. icepick (28 grams) stabbing you at the same speed, but I doubt it.

This is far too complicated a topic to do justice to here, but suffice it to say that theoretical physics and terminal ballistics frequently contradict one another and are not likely to be reconciled by a layman.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote