View Single Post
Old 05-19-2009, 18:18   #16
abc_123
Quiet Professional
 
abc_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmap View Post
Sir, I perceive that I am deeply ignorant of some of the guiding principles and reasons behind OPSEC. Therefore, please understand that I am asking to learn.

If the opposing forces know the details, and if the events are historical and not current, why restrict the information? I recognize that some information about how things are done can never be released, and I guess there are sensitive issues that should not be discussed, but I speak now of the general case.
AM was simply pointing out that the bad guys have lots of eyes/ears. Even if the local eyes/ears missed it they KNOW somthing has changed when they start feeling the pain (in whatever form that "pain" is). So it's easy to start to put 2 and 2 togehter. So if it's "History" in the fact that is simply talking about somethign that the bad guys already KNOW.

I agree with AM. Probably not the most devistating release of information ever, BUT... There is no reason to release it. What if someone only SUSPECTED or THOUGHT.....What if this causes problems with Pakistani public opinion. What is the burning need to get this info to the media?
__________________
The Main Thing is to keep the Main Thing the Main Thing
abc_123 is offline   Reply With Quote