Quote:
Originally Posted by azmg
I find his statement that he could produce witnesses that would show that he's done nothing wrong particularly intriguing. I assume that these mysterious witnesses would somehow negate the 31 recorded instances of "abuse of power" that the FBI is using to help make the case 
Isn't there a saying that says "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance then baffle them with BS"? |
Do not take my next statement as support of the moron, because it is not. But if you have watched any of the impeachement trial, which I have done for the past 2 days, all the taped conversations they have played have completely been taken out of context. Not saying if they weren't cherrypicked and played in context the same thing wouldn't be going on.
I do have to agree with him to a point. He should be allowed to put up a valid defense, and if that means calling in some of Obama's staffers to testify under oath to what they knew and what they didn't know, even if it is embarrassing to the administration, so be it.
I think he is as dirty as the day is long, but I also believe he should be able to put forth a viable defense.
Mark my words, he will be removed from office, but he will not be not be brought to trial in a criminal prosection because that would mean in fact the same people the Senate will not allow him to call as witnesses now, will be forced to testify under supeona, and there is no way that is EVER going to happen. JMHO.