Quote:
Originally Posted by Roguish Lawyer
What kind of reticle is best? I am a complete beginner, but I don't mind learning to drive with a Lamborghini if there's no downside to doing that . . .
|
Horus Vision, perhaps? I'm not qualified to say it's the best, but it has some advantages and should be discussed.
Easier milling due to .2 mil spacing between hash marks. And unlike the traditional mildot reticle, you have a hash mark to place on the target if you are holding for both elevation and windage. Since there's no need to dial for elevation or windage, it's quicker.
I didn't find it to be too "busy" (which is the only criticism that I have heard about it.) There may be problems of which I'm not aware.
I don't think you can get a Horus reticle in a decent scope for less than $900, and at that price that scope is not the best bang for the buck. You can get Horus reticles put in the top of the line scopes, though.
http://horusvision.com/reticles.php
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roguish Lawyer
Got an e-mail from a QP suggesting that I get a cheaper scope to start with, then get something better once I have a better understanding of what I need. Sounds like good advice, what does everyone think?
|
I'd take a Savage donor rifle, add a pre-threaded aftermarket barrel and replace the stock. I'd buy a used Bushnell Elite 4200. I'd rather spend the difference between a S&B and the Bushnell on ammo and training. If you feel the need to upgrade, you can sell the Bushnell easily on the 'net and get most of your money back. (This is actually what I'm planning to do, except for upgrading the scope. I personally can't justify a S&B for a rifle that's just going to be shooting steel.)