Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post - Indirect fire VS direct fire (M240, M2, M249, ETC. ETC.)

Draco771 · 11-17-2008, 20:47

Thank you Blitz...

If only the Army taught Artillery Officers (Chem Officer branched Artillery) this kind of info...

On another forum I have a 1LT and two prior service dogging me for asking why they are saying the M240 and M2 are "Indirect Fire" as the 1LT said they were...

Thank you for the correct information, I appreciate it.

I'm not going to start an argument with info given to me on here, just going to leave it be on other forums, I just care about having the correct info for myself alone.

11-17-2008, 20:47	#5
Draco771 BANNED USER Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: WA Posts: 73	Thank you Blitz... If only the Army taught Artillery Officers (Chem Officer branched Artillery) this kind of info... On another forum I have a 1LT and two prior service dogging me for asking why they are saying the M240 and M2 are "Indirect Fire" as the 1LT said they were... Thank you for the correct information, I appreciate it. I'm not going to start an argument with info given to me on here, just going to leave it be on other forums, I just care about having the correct info for myself alone. Last edited by Draco771; 11-17-2008 at 20:50.
Draco771 is offline