Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper
I'd say England and Australia already showed to how to it.
You don't drop the frog into boiling water, you do it a little at the time.
"Reasonable measures." "Sensible restrictions." "Its for the children".
TR
|
I see what you and Pete are getting at. Kind of like if you created an economic situation where you could trade in your firearms for money, put food on the table. And if you had un-registered weapons you didn't trade in, and you got caught with them you would face jail time.
A couple things I found interesting about Obama's comments on the 2nd. It was something like I won't take your
hunting rifles away and I have no problem with someone protecting themselves
inside their home.
It is what he didn't say that drew my interest.
And it is stated here:
http://www.truthfightsback.com/site/smear/293/
http://www.truthfightsback.com/smear/287
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...ets_obama.html
I think this one says it all:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/ad..._Sportsmen.pdf
Reasonable and Sensible.....those type people don't rob others at gun point.
Could be some ominous days ahead......Someday some of you might be knocking on my door under orders from B-Ho firmly requesting to peaceably hand over my registered toys.
