Quote:
Originally Posted by afchic
So if we follow your logic then a child truly has no rights then either, because it can not survive on its own, it needs the support of another human being to keep it alive as it cannot find its own food, feed itself, etc...
Additionally, your other comment about a fetus not having the right to be in the mother's body, that wins the boobie prize for the day in my opinion. I would say 99.9% of the time that fetus is there because the mother chose not to practice safe sex, therefore is accountable for that fetus being there in the first place. Don't want to get pregnant, don't have sex or practice safe sex.
I am not a proponent of abortion, but I do believe if a woman/girl has been raped they should have the right to choose. If the life of the mother is at risk I believe they have the right to chose as well. My personal opinion is I wouldn't have an abortion in any case, but I can't make that decision for another woman in a situation such as these. Other than that, if you practice safe sex or don't have it at all, then there shouldn't be a problem.
Unfortunately this world has become so narcissistic that the only thing that matters any more is ME!!!!
|
Following my logic a child would be a human being and therefore have rights.The issue of whether the women chose to have sex, or not, is irrelevant since the essential issue is not a matter of sexual history, but a matter of rights.
So following your line of reason a condom determines a womens right to abort or not abort?