Quote:
Originally Posted by JMI
I agree with your post, but I am not sure he did not have an Uncle in WWII, and it may have been another camp that was liberated. Could be he didn't - could be he did.
|
It occurred to me that he might have had another relative that he referred to as an uncle, and that it could have been another camp, my point was he should know by now that he's running for the highest office in the land, and there are a lot of folks who don't like him, as there are with any politician, which means they will be looking for mistakes and checking his "facts" to ensure he's telling the truth. With that in mind a smart person…. would make sure they were a hard target and completely explain a statements like this, if there is truth in it then why not just use that instead of stretching and twisting it to help your campaign, but I guess it wouldn't have the effect you want and I guess you can't ask a politician to just tell the truth. I'd like to think that a potential POTUS would at least make sure his or her details make sense. It’s just like Hillary and her "misremembering" the snipers who never existed. They can call it misremembering, or whatever they want, but at the end of the day they lied to try to help their campaigns and got caught, unfortunately their supporters don't care and I think the public in general turn a blind eye to this type of behavior.