View Single Post
Old 02-17-2008, 14:10   #147
smp52
Guerrilla
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 122
Quote:
But according to Neal, a piece of armor from the same purchase order, tested by U.S. Army that allegedly failed back in May of 2006, recently surfaced on the internet, from someone attempting to sell it on Ebay.
This has no bearing on whether Dragon Skin passed or failed. If anything, it's about a product purchased by the government being sold in a manner not authorized by procedures (if that is the case, but there isn't any credible information pointing that way). If the government decided to get rid of the vests it purchased from Dragon Skin, ensuring tax payers got some cost compensation back for it, it has every right to do so. The government routinely scraps product it purchased from private corporations in the marketplace for various reasons.
smp52 is offline   Reply With Quote